Home › Forums › IDNIYRA Technical Committee Discussion › 1.-2. Ballot wordings Hull Cross section and Tiller › Reply To: 1.-2. Ballot wordings Hull Cross section and Tiller
Need to reach a conclusion on the hull cross section proposal discussion.
Please look at this. currently myself and Steve are in agreement on the following text. Peter’s comment thinking that cockpit, knees, rails etc are not part of discussion is somewhat correct. However the subject here is part of “cross section tolerance” This applies specifically between to and from areas along fuselage. The following wording specifically excludes area in way of cockpit where there is no deck. this cleans it up
Only reservation I have is the issue of seat back “support”, at this time I consider that out side the constraints of the specification as other “structural member”
I believe this covers Peter’s intent of inserting a tolerance of the angles created between deck and bottom to side panels
this does not change angle that was specified originally by peter’s proposal
haven’t heard from the others lately or at all
would like to have this done, but correct. Definitely need some others to comment
16. Hull outer surface cross sections must be rectangular +/- 2 degrees from a point 6’’ (153. mm) from the bow
to a point 6’’ (153. mm) from the stern with exception in way of cockpit. A maximum 1/4’’ (6.3 mm) radius is allowed
on the outside top corner of the fuselage where the deck and side panel intersect.
Concavities in the deck are not permitted.